For Teams · Regulated Industries · Enterprise
Newsrooms, legal teams, compliance officers, and research organizations compare six independent answers, see the divergences that matter, and receive a recommendation with a concrete next step. Security, governance, and integration capabilities are explicitly validated during the pilot.
Journalism & fact-checking
Newsrooms compare independent answers, isolate disputed claims, and prioritise the sources that need checking before publication.
Legal due diligence
Teams compare independent readings of clauses and regulations, then route material divergences to qualified legal reviewers.
Financial services
Teams surface assumptions, divergences, and missing data before human review of market or regulatory claims.
Healthcare information triage
Research and information teams compare answers and identify the points that require clinical sources or professional review.
Attributed model answers
Each model's answer remains available beside the synthesis so teams can inspect what informed the verdict instead of hiding disagreement.
Alignment and divergence separated
The score measures panel alignment, never truth. Disputed claims, limits, and the next useful checks are presented separately.
Data-protection scoping
Privacy Shield can reduce exposure of detected personal data. Retention, residency, and processing requirements are validated during pilot scoping.
Organization requirements
Users, roles, quotas, and identity requirements are documented with the customer. No SSO or RBAC compatibility is promised before technical validation.
Defined capacity and support
Volumes, limits, and support scope are set in the pilot offer. No availability or provider-priority commitment is implied.
Integration assessment
The Satcove API can be assessed on a bounded workflow. Integration, hosting, or white-label requirements are confirmed before any commitment.
| Tier | Minimum | Best for | From |
|---|---|---|---|
| Pilot | Bounded scope | Validate one use case and its quality criteria | Custom |
| Team | Defined usage | Newsrooms, legal, compliance, and research | Custom |
| Organization | After pilot | Volume, integration, and governance scoping | Custom |
Every engagement starts with an explicit scope: use case, model panel, volume, quality criteria, data handling, and support. Identity, governance, availability, and compliance requirements are included only after technical validation and written agreement.
A direct provider contract gives a team one model's output. Satcove adds independent answers from several providers, makes shared positions and material divergences visible, and arbitrates the tradeoffs into a practical next step. This comparison does not replace source verification, professional review, or the controls required by the customer's own regulatory context.
The current result preserves per-model answers, synthesis, an explicit model-alignment score, and named divergence. It is not presented as a cryptographic proof or immutable audit record; evidence, export, retention, and governance requirements are confirmed during the pilot.
What makes Satcove different from a single-AI API?
Several models answer independently. Satcove exposes convergence and divergence, then arbitrates the tradeoffs into a practical recommendation. The agreement score measures panel alignment, not accuracy; consequential facts still require sources and human review.
What can a team inspect in a result?
The result retains per-model answers, synthesis, alignment, and divergence. It is not currently a cryptographically signed verdict or immutable ledger; any evidence or export requirement must be validated during the pilot.
What does the agreement score measure?
Only the convergence of the positions produced by the models. It does not measure truth probability, source coverage, freshness, or factual accuracy; those dimensions must be reviewed separately.
Can we self-host or use private API keys?
These options are not part of a standard public promise. Hosting, BYOK, or residency requirements are assessed technically and contractually before they are represented as available.
What is Satcove's compliance status?
A commercial page is not compliance evidence. Available documents, subprocessors, processing locations, and controls are supplied during diligence; Satcove does not claim HIPAA, SOC 2, or ISO 27001 here without the corresponding attestation.
What languages are supported?
Language availability depends on the executed models and use case. English and French are tested during the pilot; other languages are validated against representative customer data.
How is pricing structured?
Pricing follows scoping of users, volume, models, support, and technical requirements. No SLA, SSO, RBAC, or white-label capability is included by default without written validation and commitment.
Can we evaluate Satcove with our own cases?
Yes, within an agreed scope using representative examples and explicit success criteria. Duration, usable data, confidentiality, and deliverables are confirmed before the pilot begins.
Satcove — A product by Abyssal Group. Enterprise inquiries: enterprise@satcove.com